Go ahead and read this critical article from the Christian Science Monitor.
Elizabeth Warren speech: Stirring, or a stretch of the facts?
The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com
I did and found myself very critical of it's criticism. I read the links to FactCheck.Org backed up a few steps and thought "omfg, they're trying to fact check candidate's RHETORIC?" Might that be because the politicians that I think actually care about the majority of the people they are supposed to represent I can count on my digits and Warren is one of them? Yeah, could be.
Might also be that I consider the CS Monitor msm and I get bloody sick of their attempts to look like they are representing the Dems and Rethugs as equals. You know, like a choice between chicken or fish for dinner.
As long as we are visiting FactCheck.org how about a search on rhetoric spewed at the RNC 2012.
ReplyDeleteI really liked your article as it is very interesting to read thank you
Christian Science is a strange idea to begin with. Elizabeth Warren is making perfect sense, as are you.
ReplyDelete