Nasty exchange

My somewhat nasty exchange with Chris Reed of the San Diego Union Tribune . I was responding to this:

The 50th election was stolen!
So Washington Post political blogger Emily Messner encourages her readers to believe.

-----Original Message-----From: bugged voter [mailto:buggedvoter@yahoo.com]Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 3:58 PMTo: Reed, ChrisSubject: ?

Hmmmm. Shouldn't have expected anything less from the Republican leaning, defense contractor (advertisement) moola accepting right-wing fishwrap.
Here's how I see it, you idiotic twit, and I'm not the only one who sees through the bullshit.
http://politickybitch.blogspot.com/2006/06/50th-clinging-desperately-to-status.html

Talk to that prick Grover Norquist lately?

Here, honey, you're gonna need this, and the repugnant thuglicans won't offer it to you:








Real classy. Believe it or not, I didn't vote for Bush in 2004. But no, if you don't believe in a Specific Set of Truths, you're an "idiotic twit." Nice.






-----Original Message-----From: bugged voter [mailto:buggedvoter@yahoo.com]Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 6:05 PMTo: Reed, ChrisSubject: RE: ?
Fabulous, you want a brownie button for not voting for Bush in 04?
Does it really matter who voted at all?
Do you have any idea what a systems analyst is? I do, I called him dad. They fix bugs in computer programs. Ask a few of them how they feel about the voting machines. I'm sure there are plenty to ask, I've asked. Bet you didn't even think that's why I chose this e-mail address, did you?

Looks like "classy" overrides smart.....again.

No, as a matter of fact, you won't get "classy" out of me. If I thought the UT treated it's readers with one iota of respect I might approach the organization with more respect. They have an inordinate amount of respect for the defense contractors who pay the bills.

Did you expect me to apologize for throwing out the truth as I see it?

I've been told that I am brutally honest. I wear that badge proudly, and I live in my skin comfortably. I tried nice. Didn't work for me.

What is your definition of a Specific Set of Truths?

Pr'haps you're not an idiot, just paid to not offend the advertisers. I know of a lot of "classy" whores, most of them in the "representative" bizness, or the media.

chris.reed@uniontrib.com wrote:

Your "brutal honesty" isn't. You demand others believe in things for which there are no evidence, and if they don't, you start calling them names, all the while congratulating yourself for being morally and intellectually superior.

Have a nice life. Enjoy losing election after election.

Okay asshole, now I'm pissed.

I replied something like, of course there is evidence, but your organization will never investigate it because the system works for your organization. And sent this along.

morally superior republican "representavtive's " children (Bilbray)

you didn't answer my question, but that is not what someone in your position, or anyone on the right does any more...


chris.reed@uniontrib.com wrote:

You ARE morally superior! You think it's proper to pick on children of politicians you don't like! Your brutal honesty is soooooooo impressive!

Please, buggedvoter, go bug someone else. It's obvious I am too dumb to appreciate your fine qualities. Perhaps you can spend your time trolling on MySpace for embarrassing photos of children of journalists you don't like. It's the sort of thing morally superior people do.

Thanks for many, many good laughs today


Hmmm, embarassing photos of journalist's children?

Why the hell did this guy respond to me at all?

Should I send him some Depends?